NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 14.2x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 768 vs 80
- 22.7x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 105.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5372 vs 51
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5372 vs 51 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5372 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18143 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP107 | RV620 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 1 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 521 | 322 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
