NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GRID K280Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 745 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5374 vs 2840
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6555
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 1312
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6555
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 1312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K280Q

• Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 355
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 vs 3358
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5374 2840
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3562

Compare specifications (specs)