NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 796 MHz
  • Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1163 MHz
  • Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5371 vs 3994
  • Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18039 vs 13948
  • Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 639.056
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 3.697
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 35.796
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 225.868
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 5523
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3325
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 5523
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3325
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2018 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed 1152 MHz vs 796 MHz
Boost clock speed 1417 MHz vs 1163 MHz
Texture fill rate 68.02 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 2,177 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5371 vs 3994
Geekbench - OpenCL 18039 vs 13948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1159.046 vs 639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.507 vs 3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.067 vs 35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 293.638 vs 225.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8059 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8059 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 356
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 vs 54.188
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3579
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3579
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.048 vs 54.188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3684 vs 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3684 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5371
3994
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
356
569
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18039
13948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
54.188
55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1159.046
639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.507
3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.067
35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
293.638
225.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8059
5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3579
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8059
5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3579
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3325
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G3D Mark 5371 3994
PassMark - G2D Mark 356 569
Geekbench - OpenCL 18039 13948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.188 55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1159.046 639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.507 3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.067 35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 293.638 225.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8059 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3579 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8059 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3579 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3325
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2219

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP107 GM206
Launch date 3 January 2018 8 April 2016
Place in performance rating 519 577
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $437.75
Price now $409.99
Value for money (0-100) 13.23

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1417 MHz 1163 MHz
Core clock speed 1152 MHz 796 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,177 gflops 1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 768
Texture fill rate 68.02 GTexel / s 56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 2,940 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
G-SYNC support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 201 mm
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 128 Bit
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management