NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2x more core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 562 MHz
  • Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18039 vs 16985
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 75.764
  • Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 198.978
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2018 vs 17 November 2014
Core clock speed 1152 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed 1417 MHz vs 876 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 18039 vs 16985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.067 vs 75.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 293.638 vs 198.978

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

  • 32.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 68.02 GTexel / s
  • 6.5x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 768
  • 4x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.435 vs 54.188
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 1159.046
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 5.507
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 68.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2496 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
Maximum memory size 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.435 vs 54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1476.444 vs 1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.289 vs 5.507

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18039
16985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
54.188
64.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1159.046
1476.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.507
6.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.067
75.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
293.638
198.978
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Tesla K80m
PassMark - G3D Mark 5369
PassMark - G2D Mark 356
Geekbench - OpenCL 18039 16985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.188 64.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1159.046 1476.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.507 6.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.067 75.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 293.638 198.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2219

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler 2.0
Code name GP107 GK210
Launch date 3 January 2018 17 November 2014
Place in performance rating 519 803
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1417 MHz 876 MHz
Core clock speed 1152 MHz 562 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,177 gflops 2x 4,373 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 2x 2496
Texture fill rate 68.02 GTexel / s 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2x 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 2x 240.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready