NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 8.1x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
• 6.5x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 80 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 4.4x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 628

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 323

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 628
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 397

Compare specifications (specs)