NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and ATI Radeon HD 5830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 44.8 GTexel / s
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 1734
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 25 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 44.8 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 vs 1734 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5830
- Around 46% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 768
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1120 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 323 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5830
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | ATI Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 1734 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 399 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20100 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2336 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | ATI Radeon HD 5830 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GP106B | Cypress |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 25 February 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 554 | 537 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 1,792.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1120 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 44.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 282 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
