NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10081 vs 2818
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 659
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33578 vs 10312
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 31.528
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 828.57
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 2.985
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 152.484
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 3572
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.153 vs 21.766
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3691
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3340
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3691
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10081 2818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	752 659
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	33578 10312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	119.148 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1373.562 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.694 2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.766 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	454.799 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12442 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3691 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12442 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3691 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 17597

Compare specifications (specs)