NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs ATI FirePro V5700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and ATI FirePro V5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 700 MHz
• 5.3x more texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
• 8.5x better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 448.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
• 4.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 17x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7887 vs 465

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V5700

• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 56 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 469 vs 413

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5700

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7887 465
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	413 469

Compare specifications (specs)