NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 800
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 1132
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 542
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 7 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 800 |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 1132 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 542 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- 248.8x more memory clock speed: 1990 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 1132 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44918 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5530 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP104B | R700 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 7 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | $420 |
Place in performance rating | 312 | 244 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |