NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 176.5 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 3x better floating-point performance: 5,648 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 6316
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 8390
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 6316
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 8390
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 176.5 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 8390 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 37928
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 8048
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 8048
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 37928 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 8048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 8048 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9982 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37928 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | 27566 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 222 | 165 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 176.5 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |