NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 500 Watt
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 8621
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 768
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2017 vs 29 April 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 500 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 8621 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 768 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 3584
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 2x 5,733 gflops vs 11,340 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 3584 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,733 gflops vs 11,340 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 | 8621 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | 768 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62406 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP102 | Vesuvius |
| Launch date | 10 March 2017 | 29 April 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 201 | 174 |
| Price now | $826.98 | $1,099.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | 11.14 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | 2x 5,733 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2x 2816 |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 6,200 million |
| Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 307 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | 640 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
AppleA14 Bionic
