NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 854.8x more texture fill rate: 57.12 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 650
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24861 vs 20732
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Jun 2022 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24861 vs 20732 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 4975
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 4975 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 | 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4975 | 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24861 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
Launch date | 28 Jun 2022 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 253 | 487 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 57.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.828 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 28.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Height | 18 mm, 0.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |