NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E8950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon E8950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon E8950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 732 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |