NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 M465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 960 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6424 vs 1095
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 218
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39420 vs 7339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6424 vs 1095 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39420 vs 7339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2535 vs 1982
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2535 vs 1982
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2535 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2535 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M465
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 M465 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6424 | 1095 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39420 | 7339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 2535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 2535 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 M465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 | Litho |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 436 | 1084 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 960 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |