NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M465

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 M465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 960 MHz
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
  • 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6424 vs 1095
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 218
  • 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39420 vs 7339
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 15 May 2016
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 825 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 960 MHz
Pipelines 1024 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6424 vs 1095
PassMark - G2D Mark 334 vs 218
Geekbench - OpenCL 39420 vs 7339

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465

  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2535 vs 1982
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2535 vs 1982
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2535 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2535 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M465

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6424
1095
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
334
218
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39420
7339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
2535
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
2535
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon R7 M465
PassMark - G3D Mark 6424 1095
PassMark - G2D Mark 334 218
Geekbench - OpenCL 39420 7339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 2535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 2535
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon R7 M465

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.0
Code name N18P-G62 Litho
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 15 May 2016
Place in performance rating 436 1084
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 960 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 384
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs