NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 975 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6417 vs 4722
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 6096
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 6096
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 vs 4722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 6096 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 335
- Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 39431
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1982
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 335 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 39431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 | 4722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | 781 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 75346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 407 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |