NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6417 vs 4722
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 6096
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 6096
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6417 vs 4722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 vs 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 vs 6096

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 335
  • Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 39431
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1982
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1982
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1280 vs 1024
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 781 vs 335
Geekbench - OpenCL 75346 vs 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6417
4722
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
335
781
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39431
75346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3357
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark 6417 4722
PassMark - G2D Mark 335 781
Geekbench - OpenCL 39431 75346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.491

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon R9 370

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.0
Code name N18P-G62 Trinidad
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 437 407
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 975 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 1280
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 5600 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort