NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 5500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6413 vs 3166
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 38633
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 7 Oct 2019 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 vs 3166 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 vs 38633 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 333
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 9780
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3617 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1982
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 9780
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3617 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1982
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 3172
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 1982 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 vs 3172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 | 3166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 38633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 11058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3617 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 11058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3617 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3345 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | 4223 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Code name | N18P-G62 | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 7 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 390 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1448 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |