NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 560X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6413 vs 3553
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 16372
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 5698
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 5698
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 3 April 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 vs 3553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 vs 16372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 5698 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 333
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1982
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1982
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 vs 333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 | 3553 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 669 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 16372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 560X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | N18P-G62 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 3 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 437 | 384 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute units | 14/16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro S10000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 8830M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon E6465
