NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce 920A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6413 vs 846
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 vs 168
- 10.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 3693
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 vs 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 vs 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 vs 3693 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce 920A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6413 | 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce 920A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 | GK208B |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 1143 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |