NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1127 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 21586
Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 2942

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 Mar 2020 vs 7 October 2014
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1127 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	39431 vs 21586
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172 vs 2942

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7347 vs 6413
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 333
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 vs 9780
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1982
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 vs 9780
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1982

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1038 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Pipelines	1536 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7347 vs 6413
PassMark - G2D Mark	498 vs 333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10572 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3342 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10572 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3342 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6413

7347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

333

498

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39431

21586

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

10572

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

10572

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3342

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3172

2942

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
PassMark - G3D Mark	6413	7347
PassMark - G2D Mark	333	498
Geekbench - OpenCL	39431	21586
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780	10572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2168	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1982	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780	10572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2168	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1982	3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172	2942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		92.634
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1146.534
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		18.431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		308.42

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	N18P-G62	GM204
Launch date	16 Mar 2020	7 October 2014
Place in performance rating	437	449
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1127 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	1038 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	1536
CUDA cores		1536
Floating-point performance		1,659 gflops
Texture fill rate		51.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		100 Watt
Transistor count		5,200 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Interface		MXM-B (3.0)
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL		1.1
OpenGL		4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		160 GB / s
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
G-SYNC support
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support		1
Technologies
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI