NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA P106-100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6413 vs 6357
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 vs 255
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 34712
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2168 vs 1860
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1982 vs 1680
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2168 vs 1860
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1982 vs 1680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 9780
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 9780
• Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4061 vs 3172

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6413 6357
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	333 255
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39431 34712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 1680
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3172 4061

Compare specifications (specs)