NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1051 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 22089
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 9399
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 9399

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 Mar 2020 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed	1035 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1051 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	39431 vs 22089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780 vs 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780 vs 9399

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Around 50% higher pipelines: 1,536 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6930 vs 6413
Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 333
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2168
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1982
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2168
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1982

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1,536 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6930 vs 6413
PassMark - G2D Mark	479 vs 333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6413

6930

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

333

479

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39431

22089

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

9399

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

9399

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3339

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	6413	6930
PassMark - G2D Mark	333	479
Geekbench - OpenCL	39431	22089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2168	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1982	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2168	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1982	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		366.321

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	N18P-G62	GM204
Launch date	16 Mar 2020	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	437	448
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1051 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	1,536
Floating-point performance		2,995 gflops
Texture fill rate		93.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		100 Watt
Transistor count		5,200 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenGL		4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		160 GB / s
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus