NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 810 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1063 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
  • Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 31426
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 13 September 2016
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 810 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 39431 vs 31426

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

  • 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 6413
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 333
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 9780
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1982
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 9780
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1982
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2560 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8768 vs 6413
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 vs 333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11409 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3341 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11409 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3341 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6413
8768
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
333
389
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39431
31426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3341
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Tesla P4
PassMark - G3D Mark 6413 8768
PassMark - G2D Mark 333 389
Geekbench - OpenCL 39431 31426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 523.29

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Tesla P4

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name N18P-G62 GP104
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 13 September 2016
Place in performance rating 437 356
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1063 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 810 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 1024 2560
Floating-point performance 5,443 gflops
Texture fill rate 170.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt
Transistor count 7,200 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 192.3 GB / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs