NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6969 vs 6315
• Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3436 vs 2337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	384 650
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6969 6315
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3436 2337

Compare specifications (specs)