NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

AMD Radeon RX 560X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6160 vs 3553
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35607 vs 16390
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8824 vs 5698
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8824 vs 5698

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2019 vs 3 April 2018
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6160 vs 3553
Geekbench - OpenCL	35607 vs 16390
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8824 vs 5698
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8824 vs 5698

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X

Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 326
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3707
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3707

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1175 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1024 vs 896
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	669 vs 326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4873 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4873 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6160

3553

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

326

669

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35607

16390

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8824

5698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

4873

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8824

5698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

4873

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3357

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	AMD Radeon RX 560X
PassMark - G3D Mark	6160	3553
PassMark - G2D Mark	326	669
Geekbench - OpenCL	35607	16390
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	129.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1047.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	346.498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8824	5698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707	4873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8824	5698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707	4873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2950

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	AMD Radeon RX 560X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Code name	TU117	Polaris 21
Launch date	23 April 2019	3 April 2018
Place in performance rating	458	384
Type	Laptop	Desktop, Laptop
Design		Radeon RX 500X Series
GCN generation		4th Gen
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	1275 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1175 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines	896	1024
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s	20.40 GP/s
Texture fill rate	69.72 GTexel/s	81.60 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	3,000 million
Compute units		14/16
Floating-point performance		2.6 TFLOPs
Render output units		16
Stream Processors		896/1024
Texture Units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		170 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	112 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	7000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support