NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 5903.5x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
• 28x more pipelines: 896 vs 32
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1008 MHz
• 36.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6156 vs 169
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 80
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 38.948
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1731
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 129.441
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 1047.138
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 7.882
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 346.498

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6156 169
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	325 80
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	129.441 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047.138 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.882 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	78.563 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	346.498 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 1731

Compare specifications (specs)