NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 875 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 332x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35573 vs 28156
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.441 vs 75.429
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.882 vs 6.854
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 58.067
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.498 vs 182.11
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 7 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35573 vs 28156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 vs 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 vs 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 vs 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 vs 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 896
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9516 vs 6174
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 325
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1047.138
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 8824
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 8824
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3331 vs 2945
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 896 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9516 vs 6174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 vs 325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 vs 1047.138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 8824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 8824 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3331 vs 2945 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6174 | 9516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 635 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35573 | 28156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 | 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 | 2001.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 | 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 | 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2945 | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU117 | GK110B |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 7 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 455 | 398 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 928 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 875 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 896 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s | 210 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 336 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |