NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 64.8x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10143 vs 5214
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 658
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 44.481
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 vs 8.536
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 470.237
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 24 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10143 vs 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 vs 658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 vs 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 vs 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 vs 470.237 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1280
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1984.655 vs 1940.024
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 vs 102.69
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1984.655 vs 1940.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 vs 102.69 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10143 | 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55368 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 125.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 470.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Malta |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 24 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 267 | 317 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 307 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz |