NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1188 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1243 MHz
• 770.9x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10144 vs 7885
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 vs 38420
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 115.834
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 vs 10.152
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 597.677
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10320
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3575
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10320
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3575

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 753
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1940.024
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 102.69

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10144 7885
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 812
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55409 38420
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.926 115.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1940.024 1987.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.167 10.152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.69 105.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	802.026 597.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3347

Compare specifications (specs)