NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1140 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1335 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10144 vs 8622
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 364
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 vs 53834
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 vs 1919.95
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 vs 94.964
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 492.867
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 12301
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 12301

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 178.926
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 11.167
• Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4912 vs 4670

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10144 8622
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 364
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55409 53834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.926 195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1940.024 1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.167 14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.69 94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	802.026 492.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4670 4912

Compare specifications (specs)