NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10144 vs 9364
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55368 vs 31431
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 121.124
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 vs 8.452
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 510.941
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1676
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1676
- Around 37% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4673 vs 3404
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 10 June 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10144 vs 9364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55368 vs 31431 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 vs 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 vs 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 vs 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4673 vs 3404 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 754
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1940.024
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 102.69
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 vs 1940.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 vs 102.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10144 | 9364 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 754 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55368 | 31431 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 1958.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 120.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4673 | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP106 |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 10 June 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 267 | 304 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 201 mm (7.9") |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 160 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |