NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 832.3x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55368 vs 42289
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 152.325
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 vs 1590.392
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 vs 45.977
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 751.626
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55368 vs 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 vs 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 vs 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 vs 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11665 vs 10144
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 829 vs 754
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 11.167
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 13569
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 13569
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4904 vs 4673
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11665 vs 10144 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 829 vs 754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 vs 11.167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 vs 4673 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10144 | 11665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 754 | 829 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55368 | 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4673 | 4904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 267 | 274 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
Price now | $799.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |