NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1312 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• 314.8x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 406
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 vs 73.167

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

• 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 10144
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179995 vs 55409
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 178.926
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 1940.024
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 11.167
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 802.026
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 vs 13569
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 vs 13569

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10144 16235
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55409 179995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.926 500.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1940.024 7209.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.167 41.826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.69 73.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	802.026 1253.829
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 16337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 16337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3360

Compare specifications (specs)