NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD FirePro W9000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

AMD FirePro W9000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 975 MHz
761.5x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 350 Watt
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7567 vs 6138
Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41946 vs 31775
Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 84.462
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1844.67 vs 1734.394
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.683 vs 8.988
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 86.984
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 vs 460.234

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 14 June 2012
Core clock speed	1350 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 350 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7567 vs 6138
Geekbench - OpenCL	41946 vs 31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	151.899 vs 84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1844.67 vs 1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.683 vs 8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919 vs 86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.054 vs 460.234

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
3.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 389

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	720 vs 389

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7567

6138

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

720

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41946

31775

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

151.899

84.462

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1844.67

1734.394

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.683

8.988

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.919

86.984

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

644.054

460.234

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	AMD FirePro W9000
PassMark - G3D Mark	7567	6138
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	720
Geekbench - OpenCL	41946	31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	151.899	84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1844.67	1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.683	8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919	86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.054	460.234
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3667

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	AMD FirePro W9000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Tahiti
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	14 June 2012
Place in performance rating	273	336
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,999
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2048
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s	124.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,313 million
Floating-point performance		3,994 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
Dual-link DVI support
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		279 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	264 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	5500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5