NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 44.7x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7567 vs 5214
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 44.481
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.683 vs 8.536
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 vs 470.237
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 24 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7567 vs 5214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 vs 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 vs 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 vs 470.237 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 658 vs 389
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1984.655 vs 1844.67
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 vs 115.919
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 vs 389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1984.655 vs 1844.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 vs 115.919 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7567 | 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 125.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 470.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Malta |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 24 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 320 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 307 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |