NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 44.7x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 375 Watt
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7567 vs 5214
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 44.481
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.683 vs 8.536
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 vs 470.237
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 24 April 2013
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 950 MHz
Boost clock speed 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 375 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7567 vs 5214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.899 vs 44.481
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.683 vs 8.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.054 vs 470.237

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

  • 4x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1024
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 658 vs 389
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1984.655 vs 1844.67
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 vs 115.919
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2x 2048 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 658 vs 389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1984.655 vs 1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 125.504 vs 115.919

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7567
5214
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
151.899
44.481
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1844.67
1984.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.683
8.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
115.919
125.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
644.054
470.237
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 7567 5214
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 658
Geekbench - OpenCL 41946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.899 44.481
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1844.67 1984.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.683 8.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 115.919 125.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.054 470.237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3667

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.0
Code name TU117 Malta
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 24 April 2013
Place in performance rating 273 320
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1485 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2x 2048
Pixel fill rate 47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 375 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 4,313 million
Floating-point performance 2x 4,096 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Length 307 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2x 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 2x 288.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5