NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro W5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1243 MHz
  • 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 205 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11065
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3718
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3360
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11065
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3718
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3360
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 19 Nov 2019
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 205 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180 vs 11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062 vs 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180 vs 11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062 vs 3360

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700

  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1485 MHz
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15321 vs 7572
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 926 vs 389
  • Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69488 vs 41971
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1930 MHz vs 1485 MHz
Texture fill rate 277.9 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 15321 vs 7572
PassMark - G2D Mark 926 vs 389
Geekbench - OpenCL 69488 vs 41971

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7572
15321
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
926
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
41971
69488
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12180
11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8926
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8062
3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12180
11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8926
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8062
3360
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon Pro W5700
PassMark - G3D Mark 7572 15321
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 926
Geekbench - OpenCL 41971 69488
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180 11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180 11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3669

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Essentials

Architecture Turing RDNA 1.0
Code name TU117 Navi 10
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 19 Nov 2019
Place in performance rating 272 192
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $799

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1485 MHz 1930 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1243 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.041 TFLOPS 8.893 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2304
Pixel fill rate 47.52 GPixel/s 123.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s 277.9 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 205 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 10300 million
Compute units 36

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 12 inches (305 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Width Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6