NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 M470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 M470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 1980x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7567 vs 2331
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 307
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 1804
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 1674
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 1804
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 1674
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 15 May 2016
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7567 vs 2331
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 vs 307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062 vs 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062 vs 1674

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470

  • 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 41946
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 47924 vs 41946

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7567
2331
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
307
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
41946
47924
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8926
1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8062
1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8926
1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8062
1674
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon R9 M470
PassMark - G3D Mark 7567 2331
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 307
Geekbench - OpenCL 41946 47924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8926 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8062 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8926 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8062 1674
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3667

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon R9 M470

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 2.0
Code name TU117 Strato
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 15 May 2016
Place in performance rating 273 769
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1485 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 768
Pixel fill rate 47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 95.04 GTexel/s 48 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 2,080 million
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 96 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DirectCompute 5.0