NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 5500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 585.4x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 162.36 GT/s
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 12069
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3351
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 12069
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3351
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 7 Oct 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 162.36 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8834 vs 7572
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 389
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42350 vs 41971
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 vs 3669
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8834 vs 7572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 389 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42350 vs 41971 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 vs 3669 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7572 | 8834 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41971 | 42350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3669 | 4813 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Code name | TU117 | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 7 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 272 | 255 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1845 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | 10.4 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | 5.2 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | 59 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 162.36 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 6400 million |
Compute units | 22 | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |