NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 128.135
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11075
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3722
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3367
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11075
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3722
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3367

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9164 vs 7566
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 389
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44850 vs 41946
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 vs 1844.67
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 10.683
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 vs 115.919
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 vs 644.054
• Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4889 vs 3668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7566 9164
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 785
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 44850
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 128.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 2024.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 13.328
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 125.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 742.778
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11075
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3367
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11075
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3367
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3668 4889

Compare specifications (specs)