NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1257 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1340 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 185 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 116.142
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1844.67 vs 1022.932
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.683 vs 9.235
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 84.034
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 vs 607.721
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11281
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3695
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3349
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11281
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3695
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3349

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580

• 2x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8879 vs 7566
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 771 vs 389
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42211 vs 41946
• Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4359 vs 3668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7566 8879
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 771
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 42211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3668 4359

Compare specifications (specs)