NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
6.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 345 Watt
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3723
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3362
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3723
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3362

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 7 August 2017
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 345 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3362

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1485 MHz
4.5x more texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 vs 12180
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 vs 12180

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1406 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1677 MHz vs 1485 MHz
Texture fill rate	429.30 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	4096 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19324 vs 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19324 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

19324

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3723

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

19324

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3723

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3362

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
PassMark - G3D Mark	7566
PassMark - G2D Mark	389
Geekbench - OpenCL	41946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	19324
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	19324
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3667

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Code name	TU117	Vega 10
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	7 August 2017
Place in performance rating	273	208
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1677 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1406 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)	840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)	26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS	13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines	1024	4096
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s	107.30 GP/s
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s	429.30 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	345 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	12,500 million
Compute units		64
Floating-point performance		13.7 TFLOPs
Render output units		64
Stream Processors		4096
Texture Units		256
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Length		282 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)		1000 Watt
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	483.8 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	2048 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	1890 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore