NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1468 MHz
• 404.6x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 5581
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3360
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 5581
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3360

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11482 vs 7566
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 731 vs 389
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45938 vs 41946
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17105 vs 12180
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17105 vs 12180
• Around 64% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6008 vs 3668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7566 11482
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 731
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 45938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 5581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 17105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 5581
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3668 6008

Compare specifications (specs)