NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 4824.4x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 19.7 billion / sec
- 3.6x more pipelines: 1024 vs 288
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7567 vs 1953
- 12.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 732
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 1112
- 12.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 732
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 1112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 19.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 288 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7567 vs 1953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 1112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 389
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 389 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7567 | 1953 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 1112 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | TU117 | GF104 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 273 | 899 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 288 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 19.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,950 million |
| Floating-point performance | 616.3 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
