NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 5082.4x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 2.9x more pipelines: 1024 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7567 vs 1617
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 25 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7567 vs 1617 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 389
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 389 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7567 | 1617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 458 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | TU117 | GF100 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 25 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 292 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 352 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |