NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 988 MHz
Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1114 MHz
333.2x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41946 vs 39431
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3354
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3354

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 5 March 2016
Core clock speed	1350 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	41946 vs 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11869 vs 7566
Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 695 vs 389
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 12180
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 12180

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	3072 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11869 vs 7566
PassMark - G2D Mark	695 vs 389
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13107 vs 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13107 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7566

11869

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

695

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41946

39431

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

13107

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

13107

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3354

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark	7566	11869
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	695
Geekbench - OpenCL	41946	39431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3668

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	TU117	GM200
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	5 March 2016
Place in performance rating	273	234
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,999
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1114 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	3072
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s	285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	8,000 million
Floating-point performance		6,844 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5