NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41946 vs 31445
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 121.124
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.683 vs 8.452
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 vs 510.941
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11437
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3717
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 1676
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11437
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3717
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 1676
• Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3668 vs 3404

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9322 vs 7566
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 389
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1844.67
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 115.919

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7566 9322
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 921
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 31445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 1676
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3668 3404

Compare specifications (specs)