NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1139 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1404 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41946 vs 33770
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3358
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q

• 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9219 vs 7566
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 389
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 12180
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7566 9219
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 530
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 33770
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3358

Compare specifications (specs)