NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3719
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3361
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3719
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3361

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed	1350 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3361

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

2.1x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11183 vs 7569
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 389
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64495 vs 41971
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 12180
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 12180

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11183 vs 7569
PassMark - G2D Mark	523 vs 389
Geekbench - OpenCL	64495 vs 41971
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7569

11183

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

523

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41971

64495

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3361

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark	7569	11183
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	523
Geekbench - OpenCL	41971	64495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3668

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Code name	TU117	N19E-Q1
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	272	231
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1380 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	945 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2304
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	10800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		Large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready