NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1312 MHz
- 216.8x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 73.167
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3360
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1312 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 vs 73.167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 7573
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 389
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179995 vs 41971
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 151.899
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 1844.67
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 10.683
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 644.054
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 vs 12180
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 vs 12180
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 vs 7573 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 389 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 179995 vs 41971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 vs 151.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 vs 1844.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 vs 10.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 vs 644.054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 vs 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 vs 12180 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7573 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41971 | 179995 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3669 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU117 | GV100 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 272 | 136 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |