NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GRID K140Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 10.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7875 vs 728
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 28 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7875 vs 728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 457 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K140Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GRID K140Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7875 | 728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GRID K140Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $125 |
Place in performance rating | 358 | 324 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 |