NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 38.225
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 518.554
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9834
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9834

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12748 vs 7881
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 564
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 39165
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 134.765
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.566 vs 1316.075
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 8.799
• 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1231 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 12748
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 828
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 1231

Compare specifications (specs)